redcloud @redcloud · 2026-05-22 18:34:01

由於舊版 AZN747 論壇存在許多問題、限制和安全漏洞，我們現已遷移至新系統。我們將持續改進和更新軟體，以提供更友善的用戶體驗。同時，我們也將增加更多新功能。請大家耐心等待，感謝各位的體諒與支持。

關於評論，我們的目標始終是確保評論的真實性和準確性。然而，打擊水軍（和抹黑）的鬥爭永無止境，因為他們不斷演變並採用新的策略。

目前，我們將不會像以前那樣嚴格執行之前的規則。原因之一是我們知道，在辨識水軍的過程中，不可避免地會出現一定比例的誤判。因此，我們現在的首要任務是確保所有使用者都能平穩過渡。其次，我們尚未完成貼文存取權限限制功能（在舊論壇中，我們限制只有高級會員才能查看可疑評論）。目前，評論貼文要么對所有人可見，要么直接刪除，沒有中間選項。我們會盡快解決這個問題。

我們也在努力修訂/簡化規則。我們了解到許多人覺得之前的規則過於繁瑣。因此，我們正在對規則進行微調，以在允許高度自由地討論和分享觀點與阻止水軍（以及抹黑、散佈謠言和虛假資訊、製造麻煩）之間取得平衡。

同時，我們歡迎並鼓勵大家暢所欲言。關於舊論壇的規則，您認為它是否過於嚴格、恰到好處還是不夠完善？應該做出哪些修改？我們如何才能更好地辨識水軍？處理那些看起來可疑（但仍有可能真實）的評論，最佳方法是什麼？請分享您的想法。

Due to the age, limitations, and vulnerabilities of the old AZN747 forum, we have now transitioned to this new system. We will be continuing to improve and update the software to provide a more user friendly experience. New features will be added as well. Please bear with us for now, and thank everyone for their patience and support.

In regards to reviews, our goal has always been to ensure review honesty and accuracy. However, the struggle against shills (and smear) is never-ending, as they constantly evolve and adapt new tactics.

For the time-being, we will not be enforcing the previous rules as stringently as before. One reason is because we know there is an unavoidable percentage of false positives when we attempt to identify shills. And for now, we want to prioritize a smoother transition period for everyone. Secondly, we have not completed the function of setting limited access to threads (in the old forum we restricted access to suspicious reviews to senior ranked members). Currently, review threads are either allowed to be read by everyone, or outright deleted, with no middle-ground. This is a problem we will be addressing.

We are also working on revising / simplifying our rules. We understand that many people felt the previous rules were excessive. So we are working on fine-tuning the rules to provide a balance between allowing a high degree of freedom to discuss and share opinions, yet deterring shills (and smearing, spreading rumour & falsehoods, and making trouble).

Meanwhile, we welcome and encourage everyone to voice your opinions. Regarding the rules of the old forum, was it too strict, just right, or not enough? What should be changed? How can we better identify shills, and what is the ideal method to deal with reviews that look suspicious (but still possibly real)? Please share your thoughts.

soulsweeper_7 @soulsweeper_7 · 2026-05-22 19:17:26

This is my take on the rules

Original Reviewing Requirements:

1. Describe if the pictures are real (are they actually of the girl), If so how much reference value do they have.
The rule makes sense and was implemented so that shop owners are held more accountable for tricking people.

2. Facial Description – Describe basic features the best you can, do you believe the face is natural or has gone through surgery, and what style is the girl (clubbing, office lady, innocent, sexy, slutty, cute, etc)
The rule makes sense, otherwise people can be vague even about unattractive girls

3. Describe the body type (curvy, fat, slim, spinner, etc) and give an estimation of breast size
The rule makes sense, exposes shills from lying about overweight girls and such

4. Age Estimation, please give an estimation on the girls age, not what the ad states, what you think
One of the most important rules, shills will lie about age

5. A portion on service, this area is up to the user on what they want to include
This rule isnt so important cause everyones experience is different, but it does help if someone is saying they got dfk meanwhile no one has, raises questions

I personally agree with these previous requirements, the issue wasn’t that it was strict, the issue was a simplified easy to read rules section was needed. Realistically no one was going to rules section before posting, maybe having these rules pop up before you post is an idea.

Reviewing Restriction rules:

1. Originally the rules were a girl may be reviewed only once by a user in their lifetime, but I would like to see that changed to every 3 years as people change and it gives older sps an opportunity to have fresh new opinions. Its not fair legends like nana, irean, etc. dont get any reviews cause everyones already reviewed them. However, I feel no points should be awarded if a user is reviewing a girl they already have in the past, and the user must state clearly that they reviewed this girl and when (by referring to their history page).

2. This rule was not clearly stated, was more a judgmental call, but if you just kept reviewing the same shop again and again it would eventually lead to suspicion of favoritism towards that shop and a restriction of reviews. I agree with this still and it would have to be a judgmental call, but in order to have this we need to have our histories back or some profile page for each user.

3. If a review did not follow these rules it was moved to a restricted zone that could be accessed based on your level until fixed, I agree with this

Other rules:

1. Originally Asian incall agency reviews were separate from massage reviews and non-asian reviews. I would like to see them merged together in one section like how it is now. But I would like a tag or flair that you can click to identify your review as either Asian Review, Non Asian Review, or massage review

2. Historically a review thread gets locked after 4 days of inactivity, but their hasn’t been a limit really to how long a review can stay active. The issue with this is some threads can be kept open for needlessly too long while some threads are never given an opportunity to be properly seen. I think it would be fair to have reviews locked after 6 days of inactivity and automatically locked within 14 days despite how much activity it gets. However, if a post was locked for failing to meet the requirements then approved, I feel it should get locked after 4 days of inactivity from the date it was approved (not when it was submitted) and within 7 days from the day it was approved no matter how much activity it gets.

Penalty rules:

I feel the penalties were too harsh some of the time, for example someone losing all their points for shilling was fair. Someone losing all their points for not listening a few times seems overkill, how can we give the same punishment for two acts that are nowhere near equal. I think a new revamped penalty system that’s more clear with different values of weight would be helpful. Eg, First suspected shill posting no penalty, second suspected shill posting where other members agree its shill = all points penalty, third suspected shill posting where other members agree its shill = ban, not listening/following the rules = warning first time, not listening/following the rules for the same thing twice = 50 point penalty, not listening/following the rules for the same thing repeatedly = 100 point penalty

Facial Scoring Standard guidelines:

The previous scoring standard in my opinion was a bit flawed in description. Beauty of course is subjective as well to an extent. Id like to include better descriptions, 99% of facial review scores in this industry would fall between 4-8.5, the outliers wouldnt really be in this industry.

Score 0: The ugliest human possible, realistically/statsistically you would never use this score because such a person would not be able to survive in this industry at all

Score 1: People with physical abnormalities/disabilities, realistically youre not going to use this score

Score 2: People with physical abnormalities/disabilities to a lesser degree, realistically youre not going to use this score

Score 3: Bottom 30% of humans, you wonder if their parents were siblings to give birth to this abomination. You would instantly walk out on this person.

Score 4: Slightly uglier than the average person, things like more weight, poor facial structure, a bad nose, severe acne, bad teeth, unkept facial hair or often multiple of these features together. You may feel bad and still go through the session if you made the trip.

Score 5: The average human, keep in mind the average adult is overweight. This is a person who blends in the crowd, you dont find them attractive or ugly, just a common face. This score is more common for budget meals

Score 6: More beautiful than 60% of the people you see. You have some form of attraction to them and think some of their features are pretty. They would be an ideal partner for most people.

Score 7: More beautiful than 70% of the people you see. You think they are attractive and would gladly show them off to others. Their face hits most of the desired features checklist with some minor flaws that can be overlooked.

Score 8: More beautiful than 80% of the people you see. This person is hot, usually reserved for more wealthy people, but once in a while comes about as a gem for the average hobbier.

Score 9: More beautiful than 90% of people, often celebrity/model league, nearly all their features are ideal. This would almost always be very expensive and not accessible to 99% of us

Score 10: The most beautiful humans possible, realistically you would never use this score because such a person would never work in this industry

soulsweeper_7 @soulsweeper_7 · 2026-05-24 07:55:41

I'd like to ask the moderator 2 questions regarding rules.

1.May I review a girl I think I reviewed 4-5 years ago this week,molly@ on99, I don't have my history anymore and most new people are unaware of her, she returned after so many years as well.
2.Is their a contact email for the website for issues regarding logging in, some people I know have changed their password, but are getting error.

redcloud @redcloud · 2026-05-24 12:26:11

1. Sure

2. I think we'll just open a new section for such questions & opinions (rather than an email or private messages). Our experience with email/PM was that everyday we get flooded with repetitive newbie questions.

soulsweeper_7 @soulsweeper_7 · 2026-05-25 21:39:48

I didn't see a new section open so I hope its alright I ask here again.

My friend is unable to login, getting password as incorrect after following the steps for old members. He has tried everything and tried on different days, but nothing is working. He's asking what he can do at this point.

redcloud @redcloud · 2026-05-28 14:02:01

@soulsweeper_7
Sorry to your friend for the inconvenience. Perhaps you can ask him if he is absolutely sure that he is using the exact same password? Because if he is using the wrong password, then he won't be able to recover his old account name.

soulsweeper_7 @soulsweeper_7 · 2026-05-29 09:58:48

I asked him the exact situation, he successfully changed his password and recovered his old account. The issue is when he tried to login with the new password it is not working. He is unsure if its a glitch, or maybe a mistake occurred when changing passwords, maybe some caps lock or something was hit. He tried different iterations of the password and everything, but no luck. He has no access to his old account anymore. He wanted me to ask if anything can be done like a password reset by admin.

Thank You,