|
Sooner or later, cultures clash. Sometimes its outright racism and bigotry which should not be tolerated. Other times, there is some underlying causes to conflict which we should try to understand.
This post is in response to an earlier post "Should all races be able to join sex747?" <http://sex747.com/bbs/forum.php? ... page%3D1&page=1>, and is meant to make clear the position of Sex747 with regards to race / ethnicities of our members.
Position Statement:
The position of this forum is that while we do not exclude other ethnicities, it is primarily for Chinese. We welcome non-Chinese members who make a contribution.
Elaboration:
Think of us as Pacific Mall. We do not hang a sign outside that says 'Chinese only'. Non-Chinese visitors will be treated with due respect. However, the main purpose will always to be serving Chinese and prioritizing Chinese tastes and demands.
Non-Chinese members have contributed towards to diversity and usefulness of Sex747. I thank them for that. However, some Chinese members have also pointed out that they don't really need non-Chinese opinions for Chinese/Asian girls. There is some truth to that as well. Some Chinese members have put it bluntly, "gwailos write too many reviews with ridiculously high scores / appraisals which distorts the picture". What I propose, if I may, is that non-Chinese members contribute more towards the non-Asian or 'white meat' section and give reviews for mainstream SPs and agencies. In exchange, you (non-Chinese members) are free to read our reviews on Asian MMs and take what you can from it. That would seem to be a fair deal to me.
My only gripe with non-Chinese members is their tendency to hype their favourite girls. This problem is compounded by the fact that many Chinese members have the opposite tendency to stay quiet and keep their favourite MMs secret. This leads to the over-exposure of a few MMs (usually Kimchis that serve non-Chinese), and unbalanced representation.
A well-known keeper has told me that some white guys have tried to offer to write rave reviews in exchange for steep discounts, priority booking, extra mileage, and other benefits. Some of those offers have turned into ugly threats to smear when demands were refused.
I don't know about BBFS, but I have also heard on more than one occasion of Kimchis who offer to go the extra mile in terms of service in exchange for favourable reviews. In other words, there is an explicit agreement / bargain. I believe this is what motivated 7Samurai to speak out, and is an issue worth looking at.
Simply put, I don't think these type of profit/incentive motivated reviews should be allowed, although there doesn't seem to be a scientific/reliable way of screening them out, other than experience/judgement/gut-feeling. I will refer to these types of reviews as "semi-shills", and I ask the bros help in calling them out. I also ask the bros help in giving more diversified reviews. It doesn't matter if you had a good meal, bad meal, or just an average meal, please share your experience. A vibrant democracy requires the active participation of all members.
|
|