|
发表于 2015-10-16 23:39:08
|
显示全部楼层
Dear all members.
The reason Dino has been barred from posting (difference between that and banning outright is that he can still access the forum and all his posts are still visible to everyone) is because over a period of time we have noticed that his reviews have been consistently for one particular agency and that the scores he has given has been consistently been much better than what we feel are honest scores (for example I can accept a different between 6 and 8 as owing to difference in tastes but if one rates 3 and another rates 9 then someone is either shilling or smearing).
He was not barred because he made one little negative comment about ToAsianGirls. In fact, ever since ToAsianGirls joined us, there has been negative comments about them every so often. To think that is the reason Dino got banned is just ignorant and stupid.
He has been banned for shilling. We are not totally sure if he really was shilling or not, but based on our experience it looks like it, and obviously we cannot ask "hey bro are shilling?" or ask the keeper because no keeper would ever admit it. So we left his account so the the posting history is visible.
To all members who want to jump on the bandwagon and 為起哄而起哄 and make accusatory remarks about us moderators being unfair or not allowing freedom of speech and bullshit like that, we just have 1 little favor to ask of you, and 1 question for you to answer.
Contrary to what you said, if we were afraid of pressure we would not ban a suspected shill account of one of our long-time advertisers. In fact, you guys have no idea how many times we went toe-to-toe against keepers who got mad as hell and demanded us explain why we banned their shill accounts (who they will always claim to be one of their loyal customers/friends).
Favor: Before you say anything, please go read Dino's entire posting history first. Otherwize don't make ignorant opinions.
Question: If you were moderator and you saw a guy (like Dino) who over a period of time seems to be shilling (or shilling, or otherwize have some dishonest agenda) but you don't have any hard evidence of that. What do you do? Allow him to stay and letting him become more and more bold and 變本加厲, or open a vote every time there is an account that we suspect but not sure (and saturate the forum with these votes because there are many of them), or make a judgement call and ban them knowing that for sure they will claim to be innocent and raise a big stink pretending to be a victim of tyranny.
|
|