Well man I don't know how many times I have been burned by replying on pics, and I still do it lol.
New girl there, pics looks super cute so I decided to go and see...
http://toe88.com/jennie.php
Pic is 70% accurate, you can see photoshop is done to make her skin looks more slender and tonned.
Service is very standard, newbie bbbj with a little bit of tooth, lfk with a lil bit of dfk, I had a hard time getting hard as foreplay / touching / kissing wasn't enough but alas finally got hard after doing some cuddling/feeling up and she probably knew I needed it to get hard, so she let some dfk in.
Anyways her body is very similar to IU@BH (a bit taller though, same spinner type body with tanned skin) IU's overall body is more cute, better ass and young while Jennie looks older. Face I couldn't really tell, sometimes she looks young and sometimes looks old, but good thing she is quite cute when she laughs/smiles just like her pics...actually not a good thing as that makes her look younger so harder to guess age lol. I would say mid to late 20...for sure not 19 okay...
Anyways after today's adventure, I have finally decided to hang it up and stop being curious when a cute girl pics pop up. Not wasting more money on my curiosity lol.
Face: 7.5-7.8/10, cute sometimes and young, but old sometimes too...hard to tell, fuck it imho
Body: 7/10, while she is a spinner but her body looks old, no cute butt that IU has...unshaven kitty too.
Service: 7/10, very newbie, IU service overal is better too.
Repeat: well if you have to ask...
Damage: 150/hh (didn't have change, should hv went to nearby gas station and waste 10 bucks on gas or something lol).
If you like IU, u may want to have a look too but lower your expecatation, as IU is overall better quality. |
发表于 2014-10-1 22:48:45
楼主
and I was thinking about a Mandy Wong lookalike, according to the third pic but I guess not lol
