|
发表于 2021-12-17 19:55:28
|
显示全部楼层
Bro, I have been dying to respond to your text but the holiday season has not afforded me the opportunity to sit down and engage your well written response. First, let me thank you for taking the time to discuss this with me, and please allow me to give you my point of view on some of the points you have raised.
1. I am sure that a large number or men care and respect girls working in this industry. I am certain that you and I, belong in that group of men. This does not in any way deny the fact that sex workers are an "at risk" segment of our population.
Do some MMs get robbed? yes
Do some MMs get raped? Yes
Do some MMs get killed? Yes
How many women do you think is ok for us to accept suffering one of the aforementioned situations? In my opinion ZERO.
You cannot reduce this issue to "just a number," or state that statistically speaking the number of women dying from sex work is equals to or lesser than the number of deaths that occurr in a racetrack. that is extremely dehumanizing. That is the root of the problem, as a society we tend to dehumanize people providing a service because we think that's their job and these "inherent risks" come with the territory. I would agree wholeheartedly if we were discussing waiters and the inherent dangers of waitering…
BUT,
We are discussing women, and the provision of intimacy through the commercialization of their bodies which puts them in a very vulnerable situation; situations that puts them at risk of bodily harm and even death.
So no, in my opinion it is not ok to have any women sucking dick and fearing for their safety at the same time. Zero.
2. Your logic is flawed because you are operating from an assumption that an agency gives a fuck more than indies, and you continue to assume that because as far as you can see (probably from counting the number of advertisers here or another forum) it appears there is more indies than agencies in this industry. I do not blame you for not being well informed, but the real fact is that statistically indies are more thorough with their screening than agencies. Many an independent on internet has gone on to say that their time at agencies was unsafe and how little protection they felt/had working there.
The usage of EMT deposits to screen clients was started by indie girls who were tired of being canceled on, no call no shows, robbed, and feeling insecure about the person who was coming to fuck them. Some indies took it to the next level and started asking for photo IDs, linkedin profiles, and other much more intrusive methods of screening. Personally I draw the line at any screening method that asks for my picture, but I have never had an issue with EMT.
Do you know what is ironic? I know an indy girl, that did the whole linked in, referral from two indies, and ID with some guy (a white guy), the guy falsified all that info got to see her and robbed her then raped her. By the way, since we are discussing rape I will add that any sex worker who gets fucked but doesn't get paid, is in my eyes a victim of rape. You do not need to beat up a woman to sexually "assault" her. We can discuss that another time more.
Back to the topic at hand, the use of EMT deposits to screen clients is nothing new and has been around for over a decade now. It is not till now that we are seeing this practice crossing over into the agency side of things. You questioned its efficacy by pointing out that EMT would not do anything more than “provide a trail” after something bad has already happened BUT my brother, the purpose of EMT is not to medicate a bad situation but to deter it.
EMT (or screening in general for that matter) is a deterrent, a repellent of bad guys. Why do you think England and China are full of cameras in every corner of the street? Is the purpose of cameras to help catch guys or to deter would be bad guys to commit crime? Feel free to cite me a study on this, but as far as I know and from what I have read, cameras are used to deter would be criminals from breaking the law.
Thus my statement:
Not every guy who wants to remain anonymous is a bad guy, but 100% of the bad guys would like to remain anonymous. |
|